In this cleverly presented medical “freedom” bill, we see the potential for a very dangerous outcome. Looking at the beginning and contrasting it with the content and ending reveals serious consequences if this bill is passed.
S54 starts with a very encouraging title, “Medical Informed Consent.” Those recognizing what is really going on today are concerned about keeping their personal choice, freedom and autonomy over their own bodies and ALL medically related decisions. However, there is a remarkable disconnect between the title of this bill and the institution of emergency powers it would codify. In fact, these seem to be two opposing topics.
It is essential to read this bill to see just how much “medical informed consent” it actually allows. If this bill passes, as is, the “informed consent” will be limited to vaccination. “Informed consent” is not applicable to other parts of this bill. The “informed consent” section appears to be a distraction from what is planned for the population by most of the rest of this bill—a different set of scenarios in which “informed consent” plays no role. Those reading the title may have no idea of what our legislature is proposing to enact. To understand the serious limitations of “informed consent” within this bill, please read Section 8, specifically Section 44-4-520 (A) (1) through (4), and (C).
In contrast to limited reference to and scope of “informed consent,” Section 5 introduces “public health emergencies,” which become the focus of this bill. In addition, other sections of S54 raise significant red flags. Anyone, thinking S54 is going to protect people from dangerous, planned responses to a “declared emergency,” needs to rethink exactly what is going on in the real world. This bill in its entirety sounds more like an effort to placate the opposition to a health dictatorship by giving lip service to the phrase “informed consent.” It is a misconception to believe that mentioning “informed consent” just for vaccinations will ensure real medical freedom, especially during the next “health emergency.”
The plan written into S54 will allow the takeover of our daily lives through terrorizing the population and controlling its activities—to the point of testing, examining, isolating and/or quarantining masses of people involuntarily. The consequences of such actions are unimaginable. Vaccines and informed consent may become irrelevant.
Oops! Where did “involuntarily” come from? This bill is about “medical informed consent.” Or is it?
Look at SECTION 6. Read Section 44-4-130 (O). It says, “‘Isolation’ and ‘quarantine’ mean the compulsory [doesn’t sound like informed consent or medical freedom] physical separation (including the restriction of movement or confinement) of individuals and/or groups believed [by whom?] to have been exposed to or known to have been infected with a contagious disease … in order to prevent or limit the transmission of the disease to others; if the context so requires, ‘quarantine’ means compulsory physical separation…of populations or groups of healthy people [this should be unthinkable] … to segregate these persons within specified geographic areas.” What kind of mass movement, controls and placements will be conducted and are being set up for this? Can we afford to stand by and let the government design for us a response like this? [Comments added]
Proceed to Section 7. In part it reads, “Section 44-4-510. (A)…(2) The department may isolate or quarantine, pursuant to the sections of this act and its existing powers under Section 44-1-140, any symptomatic person or person who has been exposed to the contagious disease for which the public health emergency has been declared whose refusal [what about informed CONSENT?] of physical examination or testing results in uncertainty regarding whether he is infected with the contagious disease. (3) An exposed person should not be released from quarantine due to a normal physical examination or test results, but should remain in quarantine until the end of the incubation period. Once a person develops symptoms in quarantine [because they were quarantined with sick people?], as provided in Section 44-4-530(B((5), they [interesting pronoun for “a person”] must be removed to isolation [which may be called mental torture]. If they refuse testing or examination, then the isolation period may be affected.” Who decides what constitutes “exposure?” Walking outside without a mask?
Where is “informed consent?” It seems to have “gone out the window.” What kind of health emergency do they plan to unleash anyway? There are sure a lot of options offered in this bill. Read the bill and see for yourself. It’s worth the read.
“Health care agents” are being given extraordinary power to make decisions irrespective of the “consent” of the individual. Have we really progressed so far in our fear and compliance that we will be easily overwhelmed by those posing as arbiters and controllers of our medical freedom? Are we going to allow this kind of draconian control to be implemented? Or, in contrast, has the psychological manipulation of people’s fears and thoughts been so well completed (yes) that the majority will not only comply with such measures, but quickly and aggressively be willing to turn in and turn on their neighbors, friends and family?
A few questions. Why is there such a focus on “public health emergency” response at this time? Will what is coming be something we can expect would occur naturally? Is it possible these efforts are part of and fit in perfectly with a plan for dangerous powers to cause irreparable disruption at critical times? Has S54 become the fall-back for what was stricken from S2, now that S2 has been amended?
There are many reasons to be very disturbed about the direction of this bill. However, this writer believes that this bill is designed to destroy any effective opposition to the power of government to respond as it wishes during a “health emergency.” S54 is a very clear and present danger that has the potential to change the world forever. Those in the medical field who may be supporting or helped create this bill are not anyone’s friends. There is an agenda, and this bill is essential to it. ”Informed consent” is a red herring.
Most people think what is written above could never happen in these United States. However, we are sometimes reminded today that such sentiments have been recorded in the world in places where the unthinkable has happened, as in very specific references to countries pre-World War II. We must not allow ourselves to be set up for the unthinkable.
S54 MUST BE STOPPED!
Historical Note:
Some of us began seeking more natural practices and remedies to maintain healthy bodies and avoid drugs decades ago. A pivotal book appeared in 1979 entitled CONFESSIONS OF A MEDICAL HERETIC, authored by Robert Mendelsohn, MD. This prescient book alerted many to the potential dangers of an increasingly influential, powerful, and money-driven cabal of drug pushers—pushing legal and “beneficial” “medications.” Also recognized were the dangers of the growing medical establishment, which has increasingly turned toward chemical management in lieu of natural and safe health care.
Skipping ahead. The title of S54 suggests it should be welcomed. However, it may correctly be seen as the next step in a long-term Malthusian and pharmacological death spiral implanted in South Carolina law about 2002. About that time, preparations for plandemics yet to come clearly appeared in South Carolina law. These government controlled responses had already been decades in the planning stage and were approaching the operational stage.
From here we can move on to 2020 and the Covid experiment where emergency responses were made operational. A surprising (thank goodness) number of people intuitively sensed something was very wrong. It wasn’t the magnitude, mis-representation, or seriousness of covid illnesses. The problem, whatever its origin, enabled the “powers that be” to use this event to assess the compliance level of, literally, the world, in response to the “proper” stimulus—a type of event that had been carefully designed. These people also carefully assessed the backlash and resistance problems, which are being skillfully muted by S54. The populace has been “groomed” for such occurrences for decades, mostly unnoticed, by the careful creation of a mindset in the populace leading to dependence on drugs, fear of disease, and misinformation about how to prevent, resist, and cope with illness—among other techniques.
Why is there such a focus on “public health emergency” response at this time? Is what is coming natural to the evolution of man and man’s activities on this earth? Is it possible that these efforts are part of and fit in perfectly with the end goal for dangerous powers to cause irreparable disruption at some critical time? Has S54 become the fall-back for what was stricken from S2, now that S2 has been amended?
It is possible that certain powerful people and groups believed the Covid pandemic had to be implemented due to the political climate in 2020. Regardless of that factor, plans are moving forward now at warp speed as legislatures all over this country are putting in place strategies for responding quickly and decisively to a repeat threat, probably with a more dangerous bioweapon accompanied by careful and more sophisticated terror tactics.
People must stop it now. The consequences will be catastrophic.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not constitute legal or professional advice. ConservaTruth assumes no liability for any actions taken based on this content. Read more.
Subscribe to ConservaTruth's Email Newsletter for curated insights on South Carolina's legislative activities and conservative viewpoints, delivered straight to your inbox! With vetted and easy-to-understand information, our newsletter empowers you to become an informed and engaged citizen, actively participating in safeguarding our cherished Constitutional values. Don’t miss out on crucial updates—join our community of informed conservatives today!
Comments