To clarify comments that appeared in the recent article entitled “Is It Constitutional?,” consider the reality that, over the past several decades, powerful groups have designed many “scenarios” under which natural rights of people, protected at a constitutional level in some nations, can now be “legitimately” abridged. In line with these plans, even many states in this country, including South Carolina, have been putting laws in place for decades for utilization when one or more of these pre-planned scenarios occurs. To prepare the global population to accept draconian measures, the recent Covid scenario was imposed on the world. Fortunately, the arrogance of those implementing such plans is revealed in their willingness to be identified, as more and more public information is available exposing perpetrators and their plans and goals.
First, the recent, and largely unopposed, quarantine of asymptomatic, but unvaccinated, children in South Carolina, in response to a measles outbreak, must be recognized as a red flag heralding future, and much more aggressive, action. Decades ago, quarantine of sick people, and perhaps those residing in the same home with them, was accepted as a defendable response to prevent the spread of a serious disease. Even so one could question and even mitigate quarantine measures. Once measles was contracted and immunity established, one did not have to worry about future illness either. The care of the individual required its own restrictions. Like most things in life, there were no guarantees, but common sense prevailed. There were no complicating considerations like a fanatical and delusional devotion to an erroneous belief in the panacea of vaccination.
It is one thing to quarantine people who are sick from highly contagious and possibly serious illnesses. It is quite another to isolate or quarantine only those people who have not complied with a controversial vaccine for a generally mild and once universally tolerated part of childhood and life. If people can be forced by the State to comply at this level, the consequences of what might be imposed with a real, or effectively manipulated, health “threat” are almost unimaginable (except we have the blueprint already in Title 44 Chapter 4).
A dwindling number of us remember the “gauntlet” of childhood diseases in the 1950s and earlier. Enduring measles, rubella, mumps, and chicken pox topped the list of illnesses considered almost inevitable and even necessary for future protection. Vaccines have since been gradually implemented for many, illnesses including polio, whooping cough, diphtheria, tetanus, and many more. It was rare for children to succumb to the first four diseases. People recognized that our immune systems are designed to combat such dangers. Surviving illness most often makes us stronger once the challenges are passed. The panic people experience today is not only irrational, it is primarily useful to those who are profiting in a multitude of ways from the “remedies” now being offered.
Maybe if we were facing the bubonic plague, such panic and overreaction could be considered reasonable. Measles is not the plague. However, in today’s world, trade-offs, lies, and contradictory information regarding basic health—and vaccine reality—are being presented and believed throughout the world. Lies have included the false claim that a vaccine wouldprevent Covid despite the reality that vaccinated persons actually get covid and even make healthy people sick, by “shedding.” What ever happened to “science” and truth?
Choice must be allowed so each of us can protect our own lives as we believe is best. It is essential now to acknowledge that we are facing life and death choices. We must regain the right to control our own bodies through “informed choice” (as opposed to “informed consent”), without punishment, if we choose to control our own health and well-being. Our right to “life” is a constitutional right, but more than that, it is God-given and the most necessary right there could possibly be, i.e. without life, nothing else matters here on Earth.
Think about this. If one is only offered information for one option or purpose, i.e. “consent,” the door stays open to consequences for those who refuse to “consent.” If being “informed” only includes “consent,” then the omission of other options, refusal, or choice per se should be disturbing. Limiting our right to “informed consent” is a very dangerous and deceptive act.
A second concern regarding this irrational quarantine policy for a special class, in this instance children, is that this is an unconstitutional action restricting liberty.** Is vaccination status now a new norm? It may seem to be only a little step in the wrong direction, but it must be stopped now. Quarantine may make sense in very limited circumstances, but the potential for misuse should not be underestimated, particularly with a media that plants and fans any spark of fear to facilitate the control already embedded in law.
Two thoughts to keep in mind. Restriction of freedom of movement, association, participation in normal activities such as “compulsory” school attendance or isolation, etc. is punishment, not necessarily prevention or appropriate as a response. Second, knowing who to target implies a level of surveillance, subtly implemented and then utilized for questionable purposes. What could possibly go wrong?
Consider that, in 2002, Act 399 the “South Carolina Homeland Security Act” added to the state Code of Laws, Title 44 Section 44-4-100, the “Emergency Health Powers Act.” Currently this latter Act is being slightly rewritten as Senate Bill 54 and will most likely be re-enacted. If S54 passes into law, the State will confirm its right to extraordinary powers to enforce deadly actions. Under the powerful weapon of fear, that has been created over years of high-level population control strategies, people will accept unthinkable “remedies” for their own imagined protection. Such actions as are in this bill appear to be in direct conflict with the right to life and liberty.
A high disregard for the sanctity, power, and importance of the United States Constitution, with its limited focus on government powers and the limitations upon them, has eroded our Constitution’s influence on the proliferation of laws and government power. We have essentially lost constitutional protections. Powerful groups, within and outside this country, recognize the roadblocks to tyranny presented by the United States Constitution. And, of course, our public education system has been at the forefront of every change made to destroy freedom.
In the United States we have the means to stop this endangerment by correctly and effectively following our Constitution and Bill of Rights and demanding our elected officials do likewise. The South Carolina Constitution restates the same rights to life, liberty, and property.* If we are going to keep these rights we must ensure our legislators repeal Act 399 the “Emergency Health Powers Act” already in place and prevent further destruction from the enactment of S54. The time is now—or never.
All that being said, this fight goes well beyond a relatively simple fight over “constitutionality.” It has been going on for a very long time with techniques that are easily seen. Regrettably, reality impinges mostly on blind eyes, deaf ears, and the shallow or closed minds of misled, complacent, or discouraged people. Extraordinary social and cultural engineering has been successfully implemented. This includes extremely sophisticated and universal implementation of military-level psychological indoctrination through vast systems of compulsory, voluntary, and habitual practices (e.g. public education, media, TV and other technology, etc.), social and cultural engineering, as well as emotional manipulation centered on creating anxiety and fear as needed to subjugate a trained, compliant, desperate population. Such “accomplishments” will enable a future event or set of events to decimate the world we once knew.
The implementation of lock-downs, masking, and other tyrannical and compulsory government actions were accomplished with ease in 2020, given the years of preparation. Multiple media events, smaller health threats, and subtle mind-control were some of the tools. To easily facilitate this plan, it was clear that structural and lawful safeguards in place in countries like the United States had to be subverted in order to ensure the successful and uncontested outcome of these measures. If action is not taken quickly and effectively by the people, a catastrophe is just around the corner.
My friends, if we do not act and cause big change, I’ll see you in the concentration camp.
For specifics see: Current law: Title 44 Chapter 4 Section 130 N “…within specified geographic areas….” and Section 530 (B) (1) “…public premises….” Confirmed and expanded by S54 if passed into law.
*The Constitution of the State of South Carolina states as follows: “SECTION 3. Privileges and immunities; due process; equal protection of laws.
The privileges and immunities of citizens of this State and of the United States under this Constitution shall not be abridged, nor shall any person be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws. (1970 (56) 2684; 1971 (57) 315.” [Emphases added]
**The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution clearly states, “…nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law….” [Emphases added]
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not constitute legal or professional advice. ConservaTruth assumes no liability for any actions taken based on this content. Read more.
Subscribe to ConservaTruth's Email Newsletter for curated insights on South Carolina's legislative activities and conservative viewpoints, delivered straight to your inbox! With vetted and easy-to-understand information, our newsletter empowers you to become an informed and engaged citizen, actively participating in safeguarding our cherished Constitutional values. Don’t miss out on crucial updates—join our community of informed conservatives today!
Comments